Sequential Nature of Recommender Systems Disrupts the Evaluation Process

May 26, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Workshop on Algorithmic Bias in Search and Recommendation

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Ali Shirali arXiv ID 2205.13681 Category cs.IR: Information Retrieval Cross-listed cs.AI Citations 4 Venue International Workshop on Algorithmic Bias in Search and Recommendation Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Datasets are often generated in a sequential manner, where the previous samples and intermediate decisions or interventions affect subsequent samples. This is especially prominent in cases where there are significant human-AI interactions, such as in recommender systems. To characterize the importance of this relationship across samples, we propose to use adversarial attacks on popular evaluation processes. We present sequence-aware boosting attacks and provide a lower bound on the amount of extra information that can be exploited from a confidential test set solely based on the order of the observed data. We use real and synthetic data to test our methods and show that the evaluation process on the MovieLense-100k dataset can be affected by $\sim1\%$ which is important when considering the close competition. Codes are publicly available.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Information Retrieval

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted