Transferring Studies Across Embodiments: A Case Study in Confusion Detection

June 03, 2022 ยท Entered Twilight ยท ๐Ÿ› arXiv.org

๐Ÿ’ค TWILIGHT: Eternal Rest
Repo abandoned since publication

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
"Derived repo from GitHub Pages (backfill)"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Repo contents: LICENSE, README.md, _config.yml, images, index.md, papers

Authors Na Li, Robert Ross arXiv ID 2206.01493 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Cross-listed cs.AI, cs.CY, cs.LG, cs.RO Citations 2 Venue arXiv.org Repository https://github.com/cltl/mmai2022 โญ 1 Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
Human-robot studies are expensive to conduct and difficult to control, and as such researchers sometimes turn to human-avatar interaction in the hope of faster and cheaper data collection that can be transferred to the robot domain. In terms of our work, we are particularly interested in the challenge of detecting and modelling user confusion in interaction, and as part of this research programme, we conducted situated dialogue studies to investigate users' reactions in confusing scenarios that we give in both physical and virtual environments. In this paper, we present a combined review of these studies and the results that we observed across these two embodiments. For the physical embodiment, we used a Pepper Robot, while for the virtual modality, we used a 3D avatar. Our study shows that despite attitudinal differences and technical control limitations, there were a number of similarities detected in user behaviour and self-reporting results across embodiment options. This work suggests that, while avatar interaction is no true substitute for robot interaction studies, sufficient care in study design may allow well executed human-avatar studies to supplement more challenging human-robot studies.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Human-Computer Interaction