A Survey on the Fairness of Recommender Systems

June 08, 2022 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› ACM Trans. Inf. Syst.

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Yifan Wang, Weizhi Ma, Min Zhang, Yiqun Liu, Shaoping Ma arXiv ID 2206.03761 Category cs.IR: Information Retrieval Citations 393 Venue ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Last Checked 2 months ago
Abstract
Recommender systems are an essential tool to relieve the information overload challenge and play an important role in people's daily lives. Since recommendations involve allocations of social resources (e.g., job recommendation), an important issue is whether recommendations are fair. Unfair recommendations are not only unethical but also harm the long-term interests of the recommender system itself. As a result, fairness issues in recommender systems have recently attracted increasing attention. However, due to multiple complex resource allocation processes and various fairness definitions, the research on fairness in recommendation is scattered. To fill this gap, we review over 60 papers published in top conferences/journals, including TOIS, SIGIR, and WWW. First, we summarize fairness definitions in the recommendation and provide several views to classify fairness issues. Then, we review recommendation datasets and measurements in fairness studies and provide an elaborate taxonomy of fairness methods in the recommendation. Finally, we conclude this survey by outlining some promising future directions.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Information Retrieval

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted