Human Activity Recognition from Knee Angle Using Machine Learning Techniques
June 09, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· π IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Farhad Nazari, Darius Nahavandi, Navid Mohajer, Abbas Khosravi
arXiv ID
2206.04487
Category
cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction
Citations
16
Venue
IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Human Activity Recognition (HAR) is a crucial technology for many applications such as smart homes, surveillance, human assistance and health care. This technology utilises pattern recognition and can contribute to the development of human-in-the-loop control of different systems such as orthoses and exoskeletons. The majority of reported studies use a small dataset collected from an experiment for a specific purpose. The downsides of this approach include: 1) it is hard to generalise the outcome to different people with different biomechanical characteristics and health conditions, and 2) it cannot be implemented in applications other than the original experiment. To address these deficiencies, the current study investigates using a publicly available dataset collected for pathology diagnosis purposes to train Machine Learning (ML) algorithms. A dataset containing knee motion of participants performing different exercises has been used to classify human activity. The algorithms used in this study are Gaussian Naive Bayes, Decision Tree, Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors Vote, Support Vector Machine and Gradient Boosting. Furthermore, two training approaches are compared to raw data (de-noised) and manually extracted features. The results show up to 0.94 performance of the Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) metric for 11-fold cross-validation for Gradient Boosting algorithm using raw data. This outcome reflects the validity and potential use of the proposed approach for this type of dataset.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Human-Computer Interaction
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Identifying Stable Patterns over Time for Emotion Recognition from EEG
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiences
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunities
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted