Lower Bounds for Sorting 16, 17, and 18 Elements

June 11, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Workshop on Algorithm Engineering and Experimentation

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Florian Stober, Armin Weiß arXiv ID 2206.05597 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 0 Venue Workshop on Algorithm Engineering and Experimentation Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
It is a long-standing open question to determine the minimum number of comparisons $S(n)$ that suffice to sort an array of $n$ elements. Indeed, before this work $S(n)$ has been known only for $n\leq 22$ with the exception for $n=16$, $17$, and $18$. In this work, we fill that gap by proving that sorting $n=16$, $17$, and $18$ elements requires $46$, $50$, and $54$ comparisons respectively. This fully determines $S(n)$ for these values and disproves a conjecture by Knuth that $S(16) = 45$. Moreover, we show that for sorting $28$ elements at least 99 comparisons are needed. We obtain our result via an exhaustive computer search which extends previous work by Wells (1965) and Peczarski (2002, 2004, 2007, 2012). Our progress is both based on advances in hardware and on novel algorithmic ideas such as applying a bidirectional search to this problem.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted