Sequential Optimization Numbers and Conjecture about Edge-Symmetry and Weight-Symmetry Shortest Weight-Constrained Path

June 14, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Zile Hui arXiv ID 2206.07052 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 1 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
This paper defines multidimensional sequential optimization numbers and prove that the unsigned Stirling numbers of first kind are 1-dimensional sequential optimization numbers. This paper gives a recurrence formula and an upper bound of multidimensional sequential optimization numbers. We proof that the k-dimensional sequential optimization numbers, denoted by O_k (n,m), are almost in {O_k (n,a)}, where a belong to[1,eklog(n-1)+(epi)^2/6(2^k-1)+M_1], n is the size of k-dimensional sequential optimization numbers and M_1 is large positive integer. Many achievements of the Stirling numbers of first kind can be transformed into the properties of k-dimensional sequential optimization numbers by k-dimensional extension and we give some examples. Shortest weight-constrained path is NP-complete problem [1]. In the case of edge symmetry and weight symmetry, we use the definition of the optimization set to design 2-dimensional Bellman-Ford algorithm to solve it. According to the fact that P_1 (n,m>M) less than or equal to e^(-M_1 ), where M=elog(n-1)+e+M_1, M_1 is a positive integer and P_1 (n,m) is the probability of 1-dimensional sequential optimization numbers, this paper conjecture that the probability of solving edge-symmetry and weight-symmetry shortest weight-constrained path problem in polynomial time approaches 1 exponentially with the increase of constant term in algorithm complexity. The results of a large number of simulation experiments agree with this conjecture.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted