Learning Switching Criteria for Sim2Real Transfer of Robotic Fabric Manipulation Policies

July 02, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› 2022 IEEE 18th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE)

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Satvik Sharma, Ellen Novoseller, Vainavi Viswanath, Zaynah Javed, Rishi Parikh, Ryan Hoque, Ashwin Balakrishna, Daniel S. Brown, Ken Goldberg arXiv ID 2207.00911 Category cs.RO: Robotics Citations 9 Venue 2022 IEEE 18th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE) Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Simulation-to-reality transfer has emerged as a popular and highly successful method to train robotic control policies for a wide variety of tasks. However, it is often challenging to determine when policies trained in simulation are ready to be transferred to the physical world. Deploying policies that have been trained with very little simulation data can result in unreliable and dangerous behaviors on physical hardware. On the other hand, excessive training in simulation can cause policies to overfit to the visual appearance and dynamics of the simulator. In this work, we study strategies to automatically determine when policies trained in simulation can be reliably transferred to a physical robot. We specifically study these ideas in the context of robotic fabric manipulation, in which successful sim2real transfer is especially challenging due to the difficulties of precisely modeling the dynamics and visual appearance of fabric. Results in a fabric smoothing task suggest that our switching criteria correlate well with performance in real. In particular, our confidence-based switching criteria achieve average final fabric coverage of 87.2-93.7% within 55-60% of the total training budget. See https://tinyurl.com/lsc-case for code and supplemental materials.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Robotics

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted