How Do Drivers Self-Regulate their Secondary Task Engagements? The Effect of Driving Automation on Touchscreen Interactions and Glance Behavior

July 09, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› UI

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Patrick Ebel, Moritz Berger, Christoph Lingenfelder, Andreas Vogelsang arXiv ID 2207.04284 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Citations 13 Venue UI Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
With ever-improving driver assistance systems and large touchscreens becoming the main in-vehicle interface, drivers are more tempted than ever to engage in distracting non-driving-related tasks. However, little research exists on how driving automation affects drivers' self-regulation when interacting with center stack touchscreens. To investigate this, we employ multilevel models on a real-world driving dataset consisting of 10,139 sequences. Our results show significant differences in drivers' interaction and glance behavior in response to varying levels of driving automation, vehicle speed, and road curvature. During partially automated driving, drivers are not only more likely to engage in secondary touchscreen tasks, but their mean glance duration toward the touchscreen also increases by 12% (Level 1) and 20% (Level 2) compared to manual driving. We further show that the effect of driving automation on drivers' self-regulation is larger than that of vehicle speed and road curvature. The derived knowledge can facilitate the safety evaluation of infotainment systems and the development of context-aware driver monitoring systems.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Human-Computer Interaction

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted