Refactoring Assertion Roulette and Duplicate Assert test smells: a controlled experiment

July 12, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Conferencia Iberoamericana de Software Engineering

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Railana Santana, Luana Martins, TΓ‘ssio VirgΓ­nio, Larissa Soares, Heitor Costa, Ivan Machado arXiv ID 2207.05539 Category cs.SE: Software Engineering Citations 9 Venue Conferencia Iberoamericana de Software Engineering Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Test smells can reduce the developers' ability to interact with the test code. Refactoring test code offers a safe strategy to handle test smells. However, the manual refactoring activity is not a trivial process, and it is often tedious and error-prone. This study aims to evaluate RAIDE, a tool for automatic identification and refactoring of test smells. We present an empirical assessment of RAIDE, in which we analyzed its capability at refactoring Assertion Roulette and Duplicate Assert test smells and compared the results against both manual refactoring and a state-of-the-art approach. The results show that RAIDE provides a faster and more intuitive approach for handling test smells than using an automated tool for smells detection combined with manual refactoring.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Software Engineering

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted