Near-Linear Time and Fixed-Parameter Tractable Algorithms for Tensor Decompositions
July 15, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Information Technology Convergence and Services
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Arvind V. Mahankali, David P. Woodruff, Ziyu Zhang
arXiv ID
2207.07417
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Cross-listed
cs.LG
Citations
6
Venue
Information Technology Convergence and Services
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
We study low rank approximation of tensors, focusing on the tensor train and Tucker decompositions, as well as approximations with tree tensor networks and more general tensor networks. For tensor train decomposition, we give a bicriteria $(1 + \eps)$-approximation algorithm with a small bicriteria rank and $O(q \cdot \nnz(A))$ running time, up to lower order terms, which improves over the additive error algorithm of \cite{huber2017randomized}. We also show how to convert the algorithm of \cite{huber2017randomized} into a relative error algorithm, but their algorithm necessarily has a running time of $O(qr^2 \cdot \nnz(A)) + n \cdot \poly(qk/\eps)$ when converted to a $(1 + \eps)$-approximation algorithm with bicriteria rank $r$. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first to achieve polynomial time relative error approximation for tensor train decomposition. Our key technique is a method for obtaining subspace embeddings with a number of rows polynomial in $q$ for a matrix which is the flattening of a tensor train of $q$ tensors. We extend our algorithm to tree tensor networks. In addition, we extend our algorithm to tensor networks with arbitrary graphs (which we refer to as general tensor networks), by using a result of \cite{ms08_simulating_quantum_tensor_contraction} and showing that a general tensor network of rank $k$ can be contracted to a binary tree network of rank $k^{O(Β°(G)\tw(G))}$, allowing us to reduce to the case of tree tensor networks. Finally, we give new fixed-parameter tractable algorithms for the tensor train, Tucker, and CP decompositions, which are simpler than those of \cite{swz19_tensor_low_rank} since they do not make use of polynomial system solvers. Our technique of Gaussian subspace embeddings with exactly $k$ rows (and thus exponentially small success probability) may be of independent interest.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted