Cubic Goldreich-Levin

July 27, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Dain Kim, Anqi Li, Jonathan Tidor arXiv ID 2207.13281 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 6 Venue ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
In this paper, we give a cubic Goldreich-Levin algorithm which makes polynomially-many queries to a function $f \colon \mathbb F_p^n \to \mathbb C$ and produces a decomposition of $f$ as a sum of cubic phases and a small error term. This is a natural higher-order generalization of the classical Goldreich-Levin algorithm. The classical (linear) Goldreich-Levin algorithm has wide-ranging applications in learning theory, coding theory and the construction of pseudorandom generators in cryptography, as well as being closely related to Fourier analysis. Higher-order Goldreich-Levin algorithms on the other hand involve central problems in higher-order Fourier analysis, namely the inverse theory of the Gowers $U^k$ norms, which are well-studied in additive combinatorics. The only known result in this direction prior to this work is the quadratic Goldreich-Levin theorem, proved by Tulsiani and Wolf in 2011. The main step of their result involves an algorithmic version of the $U^3$ inverse theorem. More complications appear in the inverse theory of the $U^4$ and higher norms. Our cubic Goldreich-Levin algorithm is based on algorithmizing recent work by Gowers and Milićević who proved new quantitative bounds for the $U^4$ inverse theorem. Our cubic Goldreich-Levin algorithm is constructed from two main tools: an algorithmic $U^4$ inverse theorem and an arithmetic decomposition result in the style of the Frieze-Kannan graph regularity lemma. As one application of our main theorem we solve the problem of self-correction for cubic Reed-Muller codes beyond the list decoding radius. Additionally we give a purely combinatorial result: an improvement of the quantitative bounds on the $U^4$ inverse theorem.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted