A PTAS for Minimizing Weighted Flow Time on a Single Machine

August 05, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Symposium on the Theory of Computing

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Alexander Armbruster, Lars Rohwedder, Andreas Wiese arXiv ID 2208.03127 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 5 Venue Symposium on the Theory of Computing Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
An important objective in scheduling literature is to minimize the sum of weighted flow times. We are given a set of jobs where each job is characterized by a release time, a processing time, and a weight. Our goal is to find a preemptive schedule on a single machine that minimizes the sum of the weighted flow times of the jobs, where the flow time of a job is the time between its completion time and its release time. The currently best known polynomial time algorithm for the problem is a (2+eps)-approximation by Rohwedder and Wiese [STOC 2021] which builds on the prior break-through result by Batra, Garg, and Kumar [FOCS 2018] who found the first pseudo-polynomial time constant factor approximation algorithm for the problem, and on the result by Feige, Kulkarni, and Li [SODA 2019] who turned the latter into a polynomial time algorithm. However, it remains open whether the problem admits a PTAS. We answer this question in the affirmative and present a polynomial time (1+eps)-approximation algorithm for weighted flow time on a single machine. We rely on a reduction of the problem to a geometric covering problem, which was introduced in the mentioned (2+eps)-approximation algorithm, losing a factor 1+eps in the approximation ratio. However, unlike that algorithm, we solve the resulting instances of this problem exactly, rather than losing a factor 2+eps. Key for this is to identify and exploit structural properties of instances of the geometric covering problem which arise in the reduction from weighted flow time.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted