A Set-Theoretic Decision Procedure for Quantifier-Free, Decidable Languages Extended with Restricted Quantifiers

August 06, 2022 ยท The Ethereal ยท ๐Ÿ› arXiv.org

๐Ÿ”ฎ THE ETHEREAL: The Ethereal
Pure theory โ€” exists on a plane beyond code

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Maximiliano Cristiรก, Gianfranco Rossi arXiv ID 2208.03518 Category cs.LO: Logic in CS Cross-listed cs.SE Citations 3 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Let $\mathcal{L}_{\mathcal{X}}$ be the language of first-order, decidable theory $\mathcal{X}$. Consider the language, $\mathcal{L}_{\mathcal{RQ}}(\mathcal{X})$, that extends $\mathcal{L}_{\mathcal{X}}$ with formulas of the form $\forall x \in A: ฯ†$ (restricted universal quantifier, RUQ) and $\exists x \in A: ฯ†$ (restricted existential quantifier, REQ), where $A$ is a finite set and $ฯ†$ is a formula made of $\mathcal{X}$-formulas, RUQ and REQ. That is, $\mathcal{L}_{\mathcal{RQ}}(\mathcal{X})$ admits nested restricted quantifiers. In this paper we present a decision procedure for $\mathcal{L}_{\mathcal{RQ}}(\mathcal{X})$ based on the decision procedure already defined for the Boolean algebra of finite sets extended with restricted intensional sets ($\mathcal{L}_\mathcal{RIS}$). The implementation of the decision procedure as part of the $\{log\}$ (`setlog') tool is also introduced. The usefulness of the approach is shown through a number of examples drawn from several real-world case studies.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Logic in CS