๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
A Set-Theoretic Decision Procedure for Quantifier-Free, Decidable Languages Extended with Restricted Quantifiers
August 06, 2022 ยท The Ethereal ยท ๐ arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Maximiliano Cristiรก, Gianfranco Rossi
arXiv ID
2208.03518
Category
cs.LO: Logic in CS
Cross-listed
cs.SE
Citations
3
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
Let $\mathcal{L}_{\mathcal{X}}$ be the language of first-order, decidable theory $\mathcal{X}$. Consider the language, $\mathcal{L}_{\mathcal{RQ}}(\mathcal{X})$, that extends $\mathcal{L}_{\mathcal{X}}$ with formulas of the form $\forall x \in A: ฯ$ (restricted universal quantifier, RUQ) and $\exists x \in A: ฯ$ (restricted existential quantifier, REQ), where $A$ is a finite set and $ฯ$ is a formula made of $\mathcal{X}$-formulas, RUQ and REQ. That is, $\mathcal{L}_{\mathcal{RQ}}(\mathcal{X})$ admits nested restricted quantifiers. In this paper we present a decision procedure for $\mathcal{L}_{\mathcal{RQ}}(\mathcal{X})$ based on the decision procedure already defined for the Boolean algebra of finite sets extended with restricted intensional sets ($\mathcal{L}_\mathcal{RIS}$). The implementation of the decision procedure as part of the $\{log\}$ (`setlog') tool is also introduced. The usefulness of the approach is shown through a number of examples drawn from several real-world case studies.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Logic in CS
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Safe Reinforcement Learning via Shielding
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Formal Verification of Piece-Wise Linear Feed-Forward Neural Networks
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Heterogeneous substitution systems revisited
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Omega-Regular Objectives in Model-Free Reinforcement Learning
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal