Simpler and Better Cardinality Estimators for HyperLogLog and PCSA

August 22, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Seth Pettie, Dingyu Wang arXiv ID 2208.10578 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 1 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
\emph{Cardinality Estimation} (aka \emph{Distinct Elements}) is a classic problem in sketching with many industrial applications. Although sketching \emph{algorithms} are fairly simple, analyzing the cardinality \emph{estimators} is notoriously difficult, and even today the state-of-the-art sketches such as HyperLogLog and (compressed) \PCSA{} are not covered in graduate level Big Data courses. In this paper we define a class of \emph{generalized remaining area} (\tGRA) estimators, and observe that HyperLogLog, LogLog, and some estimators for PCSA are merely instantiations of \tGRA{} for various integral values of $Ο„$. We then analyze the limiting relative variance of \tGRA{} estimators. It turns out that the standard estimators for HyperLogLog and PCSA can be improved by choosing a \emph{fractional} value of $Ο„$. The resulting estimators come \emph{very} close to the CramΓ©r-Rao lower bounds for HyperLogLog{} and PCSA derived from their Fisher information. Although the CramΓ©r-Rao lower bound \emph{can} be achieved with the Maximum Likelihood Estimator (MLE), the MLE is cumbersome to compute and dynamically update. In contrast, \tGRA{} estimators are trivial to update in constant time. Our presentation assumes only basic calculus and probability, not any complex analysis~\cite{FlajoletM85,DurandF03,FlajoletFGM07}.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted