New research paradigms and agenda of human factors science in the intelligence era
August 26, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Acta Psychologica Sinica
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Wei Xu, Zaifeng Gao, Liezhong Ge
arXiv ID
2208.12396
Category
cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction
Citations
7
Venue
Acta Psychologica Sinica
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
This paper proposes the innovative concept of "human factors science" to characterize engineering psychology, human factors engineering, human-computer interaction, and other similar fields. Although the perspectives in these fields differ, they share a common approach: "human-centered design." In the AI era, the human-machine relationship presents a trans-era evolution to "human-AI teaming." The change has raised challenges for human factors science, compelling us to re-examine current research paradigms and agendas. Based on our previous work, this paper proposes three research paradigms: (1) human-AI joint cognitive systems: this regards an intelligent agent as a cognitive agent with a certain level of cognitive capabilities. A human-AI system can be characterized as a joint cognitive system in which humans and intelligent agents work as teammates for collaboration; (2) human-AI joint cognitive ecosystems: an intelligent ecosystem with multiple human-AI systems can be represented as a human-AI joint cognitive ecosystem. The overall performance of the ecosystem depends on optima collaboration and design across the multiple human-AI systems; (3) intelligent sociotechnical systems (iSTS): human-AI systems are design, developed, and deployed in an iSTS environment. The successful design, development, and deployment of a human-AI system within an iSTS environment depends on the synergistic optimization between the subsystems. This paper looks forward to the future research agenda of human factors science from three aspects: human-AI interaction, intelligent human-machine interface, and human-AI teaming. Analyses show that the three new research paradigms will benefit future research in human factors science. We believe the proposed research paradigms and the future research agenda will mutually promote each other, further advancing human factors science in the AI era.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Human-Computer Interaction
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Identifying Stable Patterns over Time for Emotion Recognition from EEG
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiences
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunities
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted