Prospect Theory-inspired Automated P2P Energy Trading with Q-learning-based Dynamic Pricing

August 26, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Global Communications Conference

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Ashutosh Timilsina, Simone Silvestri arXiv ID 2208.12777 Category cs.AI: Artificial Intelligence Cross-listed cs.LG, cs.NE Citations 5 Venue Global Communications Conference Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
The widespread adoption of distributed energy resources, and the advent of smart grid technologies, have allowed traditionally passive power system users to become actively involved in energy trading. Recognizing the fact that the traditional centralized grid-driven energy markets offer minimal profitability to these users, recent research has shifted focus towards decentralized peer-to-peer (P2P) energy markets. In these markets, users trade energy with each other, with higher benefits than buying or selling to the grid. However, most researches in P2P energy trading largely overlook the user perception in the trading process, assuming constant availability, participation, and full compliance. As a result, these approaches may result in negative attitudes and reduced engagement over time. In this paper, we design an automated P2P energy market that takes user perception into account. We employ prospect theory to model the user perception and formulate an optimization framework to maximize the buyer's perception while matching demand and production. Given the non-linear and non-convex nature of the optimization problem, we propose Differential Evolution-based Algorithm for Trading Energy called DEbATE. Additionally, we introduce a risk-sensitive Q-learning algorithm, named Pricing mechanism with Q-learning and Risk-sensitivity (PQR), which learns the optimal price for sellers considering their perceived utility. Results based on real traces of energy consumption and production, as well as realistic prospect theory functions, show that our approach achieves a 26% higher perceived value for buyers and generates 7% more reward for sellers, compared to a recent state of the art approach.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Artificial Intelligence

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted