Minimum Coverage Instrumentation

August 29, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Li Chen, Ellis Hoag, Kyungwoo Lee, Julian Mestre, Sergey Pupyrev arXiv ID 2208.13907 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 0 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Modern compilers leverage block coverage profile data to carry out downstream profile-guided optimizations to improve the runtime performance and the size of a binary. Given a control-flow graph $G=(V, E)$ of a function in the binary, where nodes in $V$ correspond to basic blocks (sequences of instructions that are always executed sequentially) and edges in $E$ represent jumps in the control flow, the goal is to know for each block $u \in V$ whether $u$ was executed during a session. To this end, extra instrumentation code that records when a block is executed needs to be added to the binary. This extra code creates a time and space overhead, which one would like to minimize as much as possible. Motivated by this application, we study the Minimum Coverage Instrumentation problem, where the goal is to find a minimum size subset of blocks to instrument such that the coverage of the remaining blocks in the graph can be inferred from the coverage status of the instrumented subset. Our main result is an algorithm to find an optimal instrumentation strategy and to carry out the inference in $O(|E|)$ time. We also study variants of this basic problem in which we are interested in learning the coverage of edges instead of the nodes, or when we are only allowed to instrument edges instead of the nodes.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted