Motion Planning for a Climbing Robot with Stochastic Grasps
September 21, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· π IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Stephanie Newdick, Nitin Ongole, Tony G. Chen, Edward Schmerling, Mark R. Cutkosky, Marco Pavone
arXiv ID
2209.10687
Category
cs.RO: Robotics
Citations
9
Venue
IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Motion planning for a multi-limbed climbing robot must consider the robot's posture, joint torques, and how it uses contact forces to interact with its environment. This paper focuses on motion planning for a robot that uses nontraditional locomotion to explore unpredictable environments such as martian caves. Our robotic concept, ReachBot, uses extendable and retractable booms as limbs to achieve a large reachable workspace while climbing. Each extendable boom is capped by a microspine gripper designed for grasping rocky surfaces. ReachBot leverages its large workspace to navigate around obstacles, over crevasses, and through challenging terrain. Our planning approach must be versatile to accommodate variable terrain features and robust to mitigate risks from the stochastic nature of grasping with spines. In this paper, we introduce a graph traversal algorithm to select a discrete sequence of grasps based on available terrain features suitable for grasping. This discrete plan is complemented by a decoupled motion planner that considers the alternating phases of body movement and end-effector movement, using a combination of sampling-based planning and sequential convex programming to optimize individual phases. We use our motion planner to plan a trajectory across a simulated 2D cave environment with at least 95% probability of success and demonstrate improved robustness over a baseline trajectory. Finally, we verify our motion planning algorithm through experimentation on a 2D planar prototype.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Robotics
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
AirSim: High-Fidelity Visual and Physical Simulation for Autonomous Vehicles
π
π
The Cartographer
A Survey of Motion Planning and Control Techniques for Self-driving Urban Vehicles
π
π
The Cartographer
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: A Survey on Civil Applications and Key Research Challenges
π
π
The Cartographer
A Survey of Autonomous Driving: Common Practices and Emerging Technologies
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Learning agile and dynamic motor skills for legged robots
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted