Estimating the hardness of SAT encodings for Logical Equivalence Checking of Boolean circuits
October 04, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Alexander Semenov, Konstantin Chukharev, Egor Tarasov, Daniil Chivilikhin, Viktor Kondratiev
arXiv ID
2210.01484
Category
cs.AI: Artificial Intelligence
Citations
1
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
In this paper we investigate how to estimate the hardness of Boolean satisfiability (SAT) encodings for the Logical Equivalence Checking problem (LEC). Meaningful estimates of hardness are important in cases when a conventional SAT solver cannot solve a SAT instance in a reasonable time. We show that the hardness of SAT encodings for LEC instances can be estimated \textit{w.r.t.} some SAT partitioning. We also demonstrate the dependence of the accuracy of the resulting estimates on the probabilistic characteristics of a specially defined random variable associated with the considered partitioning. The paper proposes several methods for constructing partitionings, which, when used in practice, allow one to estimate the hardness of SAT encodings for LEC with good accuracy. In the experimental part we propose a class of scalable LEC tests that give extremely complex instances with a relatively small input size $n$ of the considered circuits. For example, for $n = 40$, none of the state-of-the-art SAT solvers can cope with the considered tests in a reasonable time. However, these tests can be solved in parallel using the proposed partitioning methods.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Artificial Intelligence
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciences
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Machine Learning: Concept and Applications
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPR
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
DeepAR: Probabilistic Forecasting with Autoregressive Recurrent Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Rainbow: Combining Improvements in Deep Reinforcement Learning
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted