The DAG Visit approach for Pebbling and I/O Lower Bounds

October 04, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Gianfranco Bilardi, Lorenzo De Stefani arXiv ID 2210.01897 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 3 Venue Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
We introduce the notion of an $r$-visit of a Directed Acyclic Graph DAG $G=(V,E)$, a sequence of the vertices of the DAG complying with a given rule $r$. A rule $r$ specifies for each vertex $v\in V$ a family of $r$-enabling sets of (immediate) predecessors: before visiting $v$, at least one of its enabling sets must have been visited. Special cases are the $r^{(top)}$-rule (or, topological rule), for which the only enabling set is the set of all predecessors and the $r^{(sin)}$-rule (or, singleton rule), for which the enabling sets are the singletons containing exactly one predecessor. The $r$-boundary complexity of a DAG $G$, $b_{r}\left(G\right)$, is the minimum integer $b$ such that there is an $r$-visit where, at each stage, for at most $b$ of the vertices yet to be visited an enabling set has already been visited. By a reformulation of known results, it is shown that the boundary complexity of a DAG $G$ is a lower bound to the pebbling number of the reverse DAG, $G^R$. Several known pebbling lower bounds can be cast in terms of the $r^{(sin)}$-boundary complexity. A visit partition technique for I/O lower bounds, which generalizes the $S$-partition I/O technique introduced by Hong and Kung in their classic paper "I/O complexity: The Red-Blue pebble game". The visit partition approach yields tight I/O bounds for some DAGs for which the $S$-partition technique can only yield an $Ξ©(1)$ lower bound.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted