AI-powered mechanisms as judges: Breaking ties in chess

October 15, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› PLoS ONE

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Nejat Anbarci, Mehmet S. Ismail arXiv ID 2210.08289 Category econ.TH Cross-listed cs.AI Citations 4 Venue PLoS ONE Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
Recently, Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology use has been rising in sports to reach decisions of various complexity. At a relatively low complexity level, for example, major tennis tournaments replaced human line judges with Hawk-Eye Live technology to reduce staff during the COVID-19 pandemic. AI is now ready to move beyond such mundane tasks, however. A case in point and a perfect application ground is chess. To reduce the growing incidence of ties, many elite tournaments have resorted to fast chess tiebreakers. However, these tiebreakers significantly reduce the quality of games. To address this issue, we propose a novel AI-driven method for an objective tiebreaking mechanism. This method evaluates the quality of players' moves by comparing them to the optimal moves suggested by powerful chess engines. If there is a tie, the player with the higher quality measure wins the tiebreak. This approach not only enhances the fairness and integrity of the competition but also maintains the game's high standards. To show the effectiveness of our method, we apply it to a dataset comprising approximately 25,000 grandmaster moves from World Chess Championship matches spanning from 1910 to 2018, using Stockfish 16, a leading chess AI, for analysis.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” econ.TH

R.I.P. πŸ‘» Ghosted

Interactive coin offerings

Jason Teutsch, Vitalik Buterin, Christopher Brown

econ.TH πŸ› arXiv πŸ“š 39 cites 6 years ago

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted