Reconstruction Attack on Differential Private Trajectory Protection Mechanisms

October 17, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Asia-Pacific Computer Systems Architecture Conference

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Erik Buchholz, Alsharif Abuadbba, Shuo Wang, Surya Nepal, Salil S. Kanhere arXiv ID 2210.09375 Category cs.CR: Cryptography & Security Citations 17 Venue Asia-Pacific Computer Systems Architecture Conference Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Location trajectories collected by smartphones and other devices represent a valuable data source for applications such as location-based services. Likewise, trajectories have the potential to reveal sensitive information about individuals, e.g., religious beliefs or sexual orientations. Accordingly, trajectory datasets require appropriate sanitization. Due to their strong theoretical privacy guarantees, differential private publication mechanisms receive much attention. However, the large amount of noise required to achieve differential privacy yields structural differences, e.g., ship trajectories passing over land. We propose a deep learning-based Reconstruction Attack on Protected Trajectories (RAoPT), that leverages the mentioned differences to partly reconstruct the original trajectory from a differential private release. The evaluation shows that our RAoPT model can reduce the Euclidean and Hausdorff distances between the released and original trajectories by over 68% on two real-world datasets under protection with $\varepsilon \leq 1$. In this setting, the attack increases the average Jaccard index of the trajectories' convex hulls, representing a user's activity space, by over 180%. Trained on the GeoLife dataset, the model still reduces the Euclidean and Hausdorff distances by over 60% for T-Drive trajectories protected with a state-of-the-art mechanism ($\varepsilon = 0.1$). This work highlights shortcomings of current trajectory publication mechanisms, and thus motivates further research on privacy-preserving publication schemes.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Cryptography & Security

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted