A Survey on Graph Counterfactual Explanations: Definitions, Methods, Evaluation, and Research Challenges

October 21, 2022 ยท The Cartographer ยท ๐Ÿ› ACM Computing Surveys

๐Ÿ“š THE CARTOGRAPHER: The Cartographer
Survey/review paper โ€” maps the landscape rather than implementing a method.

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
"Title-pattern auto-detect: A Survey on Graph Counterfactual Explanations: Definitions, Methods, Evaluation, and Research Challe"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Mario Alfonso Prado-Romero, Bardh Prenkaj, Giovanni Stilo, Fosca Giannotti arXiv ID 2210.12089 Category cs.LG: Machine Learning Cross-listed cs.AI Citations 45 Venue ACM Computing Surveys Last Checked 2 days ago
Abstract
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) perform well in community detection and molecule classification. Counterfactual Explanations (CE) provide counter-examples to overcome the transparency limitations of black-box models. Due to the growing attention in graph learning, we focus on the concepts of CE for GNNs. We analysed the SoA to provide a taxonomy, a uniform notation, and the benchmarking datasets and evaluation metrics. We discuss fourteen methods, their evaluation protocols, twenty-two datasets, and nineteen metrics. We integrated the majority of methods into the GRETEL library to conduct an empirical evaluation to understand their strengths and pitfalls. We highlight open challenges and future work.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Machine Learning