In-stream Probabilistic Cardinality Estimation for Bloom Filters
October 27, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Remy Scholler, Jean-Francois Couchot, Oumaima Alaoui-Ismaili, Denis Renaud, Eric Ballot
arXiv ID
2210.15630
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Citations
0
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
The amount of data coming from different sources such as IoT-sensors, social networks, cellular networks, has increased exponentially during the last few years. Probabilistic Data Structures (PDS) are efficient alternatives to deterministic data structures suitable for large data processing and streaming applications. They are mainly used for approximate membership queries, frequency count, cardinality estimation and similarity research. Finding the number of distinct elements in a large dataset or in streaming data is an active research area. In this work, we show that usual methods based on Bloom filters for this kind of cardinality estimation are relatively accurate on average but have a high variance. Therefore, reducing this variance is interesting to obtain accurate statistics. We propose a probabilistic approach to estimate more accurately the cardinality of a Bloom filter based on its parameters, i.e., number of hash functions $k$, size $m$, and a counter $s$ which is incremented whenever an element is not in the filter (i.e., when the result of the membership query for this element is negative). The value of the counter can never be larger than the exact cardinality due to the Bloom filter's nature, but hash collisions can cause it to underestimate it. This creates a counting error that we estimate accurately, in-stream, along with its standard deviation. We also discuss a way to optimize the parameters of a Bloom filter based on its counting error. We evaluate our approach with synthetic data created from an analysis of a real mobility dataset provided by a mobile network operator in the form of displacement matrices computed from mobile phone records. The approach proposed here performs at least as well on average and has a much lower variance (about 6 to 7 times less) than state of the art methods.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted