An iterative approach for counting reduced ordered binary decision diagrams
November 09, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· π International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Julien ClΓ©ment, Antoine Genitrini
arXiv ID
2211.04938
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Cross-listed
math.CO
Citations
1
Venue
International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
For three decades binary decision diagrams, a data structure efficiently representing Boolean functions, have been widely used in many distinct contexts like model verification, machine learning, cryptography and also resolution of combinatorial problems. The most famous variant, called reduced ordered binary decision diagram (ROBDD for short), can be viewed as the result of a compaction procedure on the full decision tree. A useful property is that once an order over the Boolean variables is fixed, each Boolean function is represented by exactly one ROBDD. In this paper we aim at computing the exact distribution of the Boolean functions in $k$ variables according to the ROBDD size}, where the ROBDD size is equal to the number of decision nodes of the underlying directed acyclic graph (DAG for short) structure. Recall the number of Boolean functions with $k$ variables is equal to $2^{2^k}$, which is of double exponential growth with respect to the number of variables. The maximal size of a ROBDD with $k$ variables is $M_k \approx 2^k / k$. Apart from the natural combinatorial explosion observed, another difficulty for computing the distribution according to size is to take into account dependencies within the DAG structure of ROBDDs. In this paper, we develop the first polynomial algorithm to derive the distribution of Boolean functions over $k$ variables with respect to ROBDD size denoted by $n$. The algorithm computes the (enumerative) generating function of ROBDDs with $k$ variables up to size $n$. It performs $O(k n^4)$ arithmetical operations on integers and necessitates storing $O((k+n) n^2)$ integers with bit length $O(n\log n)$. Our new approach relies on a decomposition of ROBDDs layer by layer and on an inclusion-exclusion argument.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted