Reverberation as Supervision for Speech Separation

November 15, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Rohith Aralikatti, Christoph Boeddeker, Gordon Wichern, Aswin Shanmugam Subramanian, Jonathan Le Roux arXiv ID 2211.08303 Category eess.AS: Audio & Speech Cross-listed cs.AI, cs.LG, cs.SD, stat.ML Citations 8 Venue IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
This paper proposes reverberation as supervision (RAS), a novel unsupervised loss function for single-channel reverberant speech separation. Prior methods for unsupervised separation required the synthesis of mixtures of mixtures or assumed the existence of a teacher model, making them difficult to consider as potential methods explaining the emergence of separation abilities in an animal's auditory system. We assume the availability of two-channel mixtures at training time, and train a neural network to separate the sources given one of the channels as input such that the other channel may be predicted from the separated sources. As the relationship between the room impulse responses (RIRs) of each channel depends on the locations of the sources, which are unknown to the network, the network cannot rely on learning that relationship. Instead, our proposed loss function fits each of the separated sources to the mixture in the target channel via Wiener filtering, and compares the resulting mixture to the ground-truth one. We show that minimizing the scale-invariant signal-to-distortion ratio (SI-SDR) of the predicted right-channel mixture with respect to the ground truth implicitly guides the network towards separating the left-channel sources. On a semi-supervised reverberant speech separation task based on the WHAMR! dataset, using training data where just 5% (resp., 10%) of the mixtures are labeled with associated isolated sources, we achieve 70% (resp., 78%) of the SI-SDR improvement obtained when training with supervision on the full training set, while a model trained only on the labeled data obtains 43% (resp., 45%).
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Audio & Speech

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted