Reverberation as Supervision for Speech Separation
November 15, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· π IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Rohith Aralikatti, Christoph Boeddeker, Gordon Wichern, Aswin Shanmugam Subramanian, Jonathan Le Roux
arXiv ID
2211.08303
Category
eess.AS: Audio & Speech
Cross-listed
cs.AI,
cs.LG,
cs.SD,
stat.ML
Citations
8
Venue
IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
This paper proposes reverberation as supervision (RAS), a novel unsupervised loss function for single-channel reverberant speech separation. Prior methods for unsupervised separation required the synthesis of mixtures of mixtures or assumed the existence of a teacher model, making them difficult to consider as potential methods explaining the emergence of separation abilities in an animal's auditory system. We assume the availability of two-channel mixtures at training time, and train a neural network to separate the sources given one of the channels as input such that the other channel may be predicted from the separated sources. As the relationship between the room impulse responses (RIRs) of each channel depends on the locations of the sources, which are unknown to the network, the network cannot rely on learning that relationship. Instead, our proposed loss function fits each of the separated sources to the mixture in the target channel via Wiener filtering, and compares the resulting mixture to the ground-truth one. We show that minimizing the scale-invariant signal-to-distortion ratio (SI-SDR) of the predicted right-channel mixture with respect to the ground truth implicitly guides the network towards separating the left-channel sources. On a semi-supervised reverberant speech separation task based on the WHAMR! dataset, using training data where just 5% (resp., 10%) of the mixtures are labeled with associated isolated sources, we achieve 70% (resp., 78%) of the SI-SDR improvement obtained when training with supervision on the full training set, while a model trained only on the labeled data obtains 43% (resp., 45%).
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Audio & Speech
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
LPCNet: Improving Neural Speech Synthesis Through Linear Prediction
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
VoiceFilter: Targeted Voice Separation by Speaker-Conditioned Spectrogram Masking
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
TERA: Self-Supervised Learning of Transformer Encoder Representation for Speech
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Mockingjay: Unsupervised Speech Representation Learning with Deep Bidirectional Transformer Encoders
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Utterance-level Aggregation For Speaker Recognition In The Wild
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted