SCAPHY: Detecting Modern ICS Attacks by Correlating Behaviors in SCADA and PHYsical
November 26, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· π IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Moses Ike, Kandy Phan, Keaton Sadoski, Romuald Valme, Wenke Lee
arXiv ID
2211.14642
Category
cs.CR: Cryptography & Security
Citations
11
Venue
IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
Modern Industrial Control Systems (ICS) attacks evade existing tools by using knowledge of ICS processes to blend their activities with benign Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) operation, causing physical world damages. We present SCAPHY to detect ICS attacks in SCADA by leveraging the unique execution phases of SCADA to identify the limited set of legitimate behaviors to control the physical world in different phases, which differentiates from attackers activities. For example, it is typical for SCADA to setup ICS device objects during initialization, but anomalous during processcontrol. To extract unique behaviors of SCADA execution phases, SCAPHY first leverages open ICS conventions to generate a novel physical process dependency and impact graph (PDIG) to identify disruptive physical states. SCAPHY then uses PDIG to inform a physical process-aware dynamic analysis, whereby code paths of SCADA process-control execution is induced to reveal API call behaviors unique to legitimate process-control phases. Using this established behavior, SCAPHY selectively monitors attackers physical world-targeted activities that violates legitimate processcontrol behaviors. We evaluated SCAPHY at a U.S. national lab ICS testbed environment. Using diverse ICS deployment scenarios and attacks across 4 ICS industries, SCAPHY achieved 95% accuracy & 3.5% false positives (FP), compared to 47.5% accuracy and 25% FP of existing work. We analyze SCAPHYs resilience to futuristic attacks where attacker knows our approach.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Cryptography & Security
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Spectre Attacks: Exploiting Speculative Execution
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
How To Backdoor Federated Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Time
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted