PAC-Bayes Bounds for Bandit Problems: A Survey and Experimental Comparison
November 29, 2022 Β· The Cartographer Β· π IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
"Title-pattern auto-detect: PAC-Bayes Bounds for Bandit Problems: A Survey and Experimental Comparison"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Hamish Flynn, David Reeb, Melih Kandemir, Jan Peters
arXiv ID
2211.16110
Category
cs.LG: Machine Learning
Cross-listed
stat.ML
Citations
7
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Last Checked
1 day ago
Abstract
PAC-Bayes has recently re-emerged as an effective theory with which one can derive principled learning algorithms with tight performance guarantees. However, applications of PAC-Bayes to bandit problems are relatively rare, which is a great misfortune. Many decision-making problems in healthcare, finance and natural sciences can be modelled as bandit problems. In many of these applications, principled algorithms with strong performance guarantees would be very much appreciated. This survey provides an overview of PAC-Bayes bounds for bandit problems and an experimental comparison of these bounds. On the one hand, we found that PAC-Bayes bounds are a useful tool for designing offline bandit algorithms with performance guarantees. In our experiments, a PAC-Bayesian offline contextual bandit algorithm was able to learn randomised neural network polices with competitive expected reward and non-vacuous performance guarantees. On the other hand, the PAC-Bayesian online bandit algorithms that we tested had loose cumulative regret bounds. We conclude by discussing some topics for future work on PAC-Bayesian bandit algorithms.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Machine Learning
ποΈ
ποΈ
Transcended
ποΈ
ποΈ
Transcended
Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning
π
π
Old Age
Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networks
π
π
Old Age
Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actor
π
π
Old Age
SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restarts
ποΈ
ποΈ
Transcended