PAC-Bayes Bounds for Bandit Problems: A Survey and Experimental Comparison

November 29, 2022 Β· The Cartographer Β· πŸ› IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

πŸ“š THE CARTOGRAPHER: The Cartographer
Survey/review paper β€” maps the landscape rather than implementing a method.

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
"Title-pattern auto-detect: PAC-Bayes Bounds for Bandit Problems: A Survey and Experimental Comparison"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Hamish Flynn, David Reeb, Melih Kandemir, Jan Peters arXiv ID 2211.16110 Category cs.LG: Machine Learning Cross-listed stat.ML Citations 7 Venue IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence Last Checked 1 day ago
Abstract
PAC-Bayes has recently re-emerged as an effective theory with which one can derive principled learning algorithms with tight performance guarantees. However, applications of PAC-Bayes to bandit problems are relatively rare, which is a great misfortune. Many decision-making problems in healthcare, finance and natural sciences can be modelled as bandit problems. In many of these applications, principled algorithms with strong performance guarantees would be very much appreciated. This survey provides an overview of PAC-Bayes bounds for bandit problems and an experimental comparison of these bounds. On the one hand, we found that PAC-Bayes bounds are a useful tool for designing offline bandit algorithms with performance guarantees. In our experiments, a PAC-Bayesian offline contextual bandit algorithm was able to learn randomised neural network polices with competitive expected reward and non-vacuous performance guarantees. On the other hand, the PAC-Bayesian online bandit algorithms that we tested had loose cumulative regret bounds. We conclude by discussing some topics for future work on PAC-Bayesian bandit algorithms.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Machine Learning