MOPRD: A multidisciplinary open peer review dataset
December 09, 2022 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐ Neural computing & applications (Print)
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Jialiang Lin, Jiaxin Song, Zhangping Zhou, Yidong Chen, Xiaodong Shi
arXiv ID
2212.04972
Category
cs.DL: Digital Libraries
Cross-listed
cs.AI,
cs.CL,
cs.LG
Citations
30
Venue
Neural computing & applications (Print)
Last Checked
2 months ago
Abstract
Open peer review is a growing trend in academic publications. Public access to peer review data can benefit both the academic and publishing communities. It also serves as a great support to studies on review comment generation and further to the realization of automated scholarly paper review. However, most of the existing peer review datasets do not provide data that cover the whole peer review process. Apart from this, their data are not diversified enough as the data are mainly collected from the field of computer science. These two drawbacks of the currently available peer review datasets need to be addressed to unlock more opportunities for related studies. In response, we construct MOPRD, a multidisciplinary open peer review dataset. This dataset consists of paper metadata, multiple version manuscripts, review comments, meta-reviews, author's rebuttal letters, and editorial decisions. Moreover, we propose a modular guided review comment generation method based on MOPRD. Experiments show that our method delivers better performance as indicated by both automatic metrics and human evaluation. We also explore other potential applications of MOPRD, including meta-review generation, editorial decision prediction, author rebuttal generation, and scientometric analysis. MOPRD is a strong endorsement for further studies in peer review-related research and other applications.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Digital Libraries
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Measuring academic influence: Not all citations are equal
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
The Open Access Advantage Considering Citation, Article Usage and Social Media Attention
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
A Bibliometric Review of Large Language Models Research from 2017 to 2023
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
On the Performance of Hybrid Search Strategies for Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
A Systematic Identification and Analysis of Scientists on Twitter
Died the same way โ ๐ป Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted