Reinforcement Learning Applied to Trading Systems: A Survey

November 01, 2022 Β· The Cartographer Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ“š THE CARTOGRAPHER: The Cartographer
Survey/review paper β€” maps the landscape rather than implementing a method.

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
"Title-pattern auto-detect: Reinforcement Learning Applied to Trading Systems: A Survey"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Leonardo Kanashiro Felizardo, Francisco Caio Lima Paiva, Anna Helena Reali Costa, Emilio Del-Moral-Hernandez arXiv ID 2212.06064 Category cs.AI: Artificial Intelligence Citations 4 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 days ago
Abstract
Financial domain tasks, such as trading in market exchanges, are challenging and have long attracted researchers. The recent achievements and the consequent notoriety of Reinforcement Learning (RL) have also increased its adoption in trading tasks. RL uses a framework with well-established formal concepts, which raises its attractiveness in learning profitable trading strategies. However, RL use without due attention in the financial area can prevent new researchers from following standards or failing to adopt relevant conceptual guidelines. In this work, we embrace the seminal RL technical fundamentals, concepts, and recommendations to perform a unified, theoretically-grounded examination and comparison of previous research that could serve as a structuring guide for the field of study. A selection of twenty-nine articles was reviewed under our classification that considers RL's most common formulations and design patterns from a large volume of available studies. This classification allowed for precise inspection of the most relevant aspects regarding data input, preprocessing, state and action composition, adopted RL techniques, evaluation setups, and overall results. Our analysis approach organized around fundamental RL concepts allowed for a clear identification of current system design best practices, gaps that require further investigation, and promising research opportunities. Finally, this review attempts to promote the development of this field of study by facilitating researchers' commitment to standards adherence and helping them to avoid straying away from the RL constructs' firm ground.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Artificial Intelligence