Using Machine Learning to Determine Morphologies of $z<1$ AGN Host Galaxies in the Hyper Suprime-Cam Wide Survey
December 20, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Astrophysical Journal
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Chuan Tian, C. Megan Urry, Aritra Ghosh, Ryan Ofman, Tonima Tasnim Ananna, Connor Auge, Nico Cappelluti, Meredith C. Powell, David B. Sanders, Kevin Schawinski, Dominic Stark, Grant R. Tremblay
arXiv ID
2212.09984
Category
astro-ph.GA
Cross-listed
astro-ph.IM,
cs.LG
Citations
3
Venue
Astrophysical Journal
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
We present a machine-learning framework to accurately characterize morphologies of Active Galactic Nucleus (AGN) host galaxies within $z<1$. We first use PSFGAN to decouple host galaxy light from the central point source, then we invoke the Galaxy Morphology Network (GaMorNet) to estimate whether the host galaxy is disk-dominated, bulge-dominated, or indeterminate. Using optical images from five bands of the HSC Wide Survey, we build models independently in three redshift bins: low $(0<z<0.25)$, medium $(0.25<z<0.5)$, and high $(0.5<z<1.0)$. By first training on a large number of simulated galaxies, then fine-tuning using far fewer classified real galaxies, our framework predicts the actual morphology for $\sim$ $60\%-70\%$ host galaxies from test sets, with a classification precision of $\sim$ $80\%-95\%$, depending on redshift bin. Specifically, our models achieve disk precision of $96\%/82\%/79\%$ and bulge precision of $90\%/90\%/80\%$ (for the 3 redshift bins), at thresholds corresponding to indeterminate fractions of $30\%/43\%/42\%$. The classification precision of our models has a noticeable dependency on host galaxy radius and magnitude. No strong dependency is observed on contrast ratio. Comparing classifications of real AGNs, our models agree well with traditional 2D fitting with GALFIT. The PSFGAN+GaMorNet framework does not depend on the choice of fitting functions or galaxy-related input parameters, runs orders of magnitude faster than GALFIT, and is easily generalizable via transfer learning, making it an ideal tool for studying AGN host galaxy morphology in forthcoming large imaging survey.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β astro-ph.GA
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Attention-gating for improved radio galaxy classification
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
A Selection of Giant Radio Sources from NVSS
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Exploring galaxy evolution with generative models
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
A machine learning approach to galaxy properties: joint redshift-stellar mass probability distributions with Random Forest
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
StarcNet: Machine Learning for Star Cluster Identification
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted