A literature review on different types of empirically evaluated bug localization approaches

December 22, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Filip Zamfirov arXiv ID 2212.11774 Category cs.SE: Software Engineering Citations 1 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Today, software systems have a significant role in various domains among which are healthcare, entertainment, transport and logistics, and many more. It is only natural that with this increasing dependency on software, the number of software systems increases. Additionally, these systems become more and more complex. All this leads to a rise in the number of software faults also known as bugs. As a result, the ability to locate the source of a bug (e.g. a file or a commit) is vital for the development and maintenance of efficient software solutions. Bug localization refers to the automated process of discovering files that contain bugs, based on a bug report. This research project aims to make a literature review on different techniques for bug localization. This study distinguishes itself from other surveys and literature reviews [1] in one significant way. The focus of the work is on identifying, categorizing and analyzing existing bug localization methods and tools which were evaluated in an industrial setting. To the best of my knowledge, there are no other works that prioritise this aspect. Unfortunately, such literature is scarce, therefore, bug localization techniques evaluated on open source software are also included.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Software Engineering

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted