Joint Action is a Framework for Understanding Partnerships Between Humans and Upper Limb Prostheses

December 28, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Michael R. Dawson, Adam S. R. Parker, Heather E. Williams, Ahmed W. Shehata, Jacqueline S. Hebert, Craig S. Chapman, Patrick M. Pilarski arXiv ID 2212.14124 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Cross-listed cs.AI, cs.MA, cs.RO Citations 1 Venue International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Recent advances in upper limb prostheses have led to significant improvements in the number of movements provided by the robotic limb. However, the method for controlling multiple degrees of freedom via user-generated signals remains challenging. To address this issue, various machine learning controllers have been developed to better predict movement intent. As these controllers become more intelligent and take on more autonomy in the system, the traditional approach of representing the human-machine interface as a human controlling a tool becomes limiting. One possible approach to improve the understanding of these interfaces is to model them as collaborative, multi-agent systems through the lens of joint action. The field of joint action has been commonly applied to two human partners who are trying to work jointly together to achieve a task, such as singing or moving a table together, by effecting coordinated change in their shared environment. In this work, we compare different prosthesis controllers (proportional electromyography with sequential switching, pattern recognition, and adaptive switching) in terms of how they present the hallmarks of joint action. The results of the comparison lead to a new perspective for understanding how existing myoelectric systems relate to each other, along with recommendations for how to improve these systems by increasing the collaborative communication between each partner.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Human-Computer Interaction

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted