Maintaining Triconnected Components under Node Expansion

January 10, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International/Italian Conference on Algorithms and Complexity

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Simon D. Fink, Ignaz Rutter arXiv ID 2301.03972 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.DM Citations 2 Venue International/Italian Conference on Algorithms and Complexity Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
SPQR-trees are a central component of graph drawing and are also important in many further areas of computer science. From their inception onwards, they have always had a strong relation to dynamic algorithms maintaining information, e.g., on planarity and triconnectivity, under edge insertion and, later on, also deletion. In this paper, we focus on a special kind of dynamic update, the expansion of vertices into arbitrary biconnected graphs, while maintaining the SPQR-tree and further information. This will also allow us to efficiently merge two SPQR-trees by identifying the edges incident to two vertices with each other. We do this working along an axiomatic definition lifting the SPQR-tree to a stand-alone data structure that can be modified independently from the graph it might have been derived from. Making changes to this structure, we can now observe how the graph represented by the SPQR-tree changes, instead of having to reason which updates to the SPQR-tree are necessary after a change to the represented graph. Using efficient expansions and merges allows us to improve the runtime of the Synchronized Planarity algorithm by BlΓ€sius et al. [ESA 2021] from $O(m^2)$ to $O(m\cdot Ξ”)$, where $Ξ”$ is the maximum pipe degree. This also reduces the time for solving several constrained planarity problems, e.g. for Clustered Planarity from $O((n+d)^2)$ to $O(n+d\cdot Ξ”)$, where $d$ is the total number of crossings between cluster borders and edges and $Ξ”$ is the maximum number of edge crossings on a single cluster border.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted