Navigating the reporting guideline environment for computational pathology: A review
January 03, 2023 ยท The Cartographer ยท ๐ arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
"Title-pattern auto-detect: Navigating the reporting guideline environment for computational pathology: A review"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Clare McGenity, Darren Treanor
arXiv ID
2301.09985
Category
cs.CY: Computers & Society
Cross-listed
cs.AI,
cs.HC
Citations
0
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
4 days ago
Abstract
The application of new artificial intelligence (AI) discoveries is transforming healthcare research. However, the standards of reporting are variable in this still evolving field, leading to potential research waste. The aim of this work is to highlight resources and reporting guidelines available to researchers working in computational pathology. The EQUATOR Network library of reporting guidelines and extensions was systematically searched up to August 2022 to identify applicable resources. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were used and guidance was screened for utility at different stages of research and for a range of study types. Items were compiled to create a summary for easy identification of useful resources and guidance. Over 70 published resources applicable to pathology AI research were identified. Guidelines were divided into key categories, reflecting current study types and target areas for AI research: Literature & Research Priorities, Discovery, Clinical Trial, Implementation and Post-Implementation & Guidelines. Guidelines useful at multiple stages of research and those currently in development were also highlighted. Summary tables with links to guidelines for these groups were developed, to assist those working in cancer AI research with complete reporting of research. Issues with replication and research waste are recognised problems in AI research. Reporting guidelines can be used as templates to ensure the essential information needed to replicate research is included within journal articles and abstracts. Reporting guidelines are available and useful for many study types, but greater awareness is needed to encourage researchers to utilise them and for journals to adopt them. This review and summary of resources highlights guidance to researchers, aiming to improve completeness of reporting.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Computers & Society
๐
๐
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Artificial Intelligence: the global landscape of ethics guidelines
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Green AI
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted