Lower Bounds for Learning in Revealing POMDPs

February 02, 2023 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› International Conference on Machine Learning

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Fan Chen, Huan Wang, Caiming Xiong, Song Mei, Yu Bai arXiv ID 2302.01333 Category cs.LG: Machine Learning Cross-listed cs.IT, math.ST, stat.ML Citations 18 Venue International Conference on Machine Learning Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
This paper studies the fundamental limits of reinforcement learning (RL) in the challenging \emph{partially observable} setting. While it is well-established that learning in Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDPs) requires exponentially many samples in the worst case, a surge of recent work shows that polynomial sample complexities are achievable under the \emph{revealing condition} -- A natural condition that requires the observables to reveal some information about the unobserved latent states. However, the fundamental limits for learning in revealing POMDPs are much less understood, with existing lower bounds being rather preliminary and having substantial gaps from the current best upper bounds. We establish strong PAC and regret lower bounds for learning in revealing POMDPs. Our lower bounds scale polynomially in all relevant problem parameters in a multiplicative fashion, and achieve significantly smaller gaps against the current best upper bounds, providing a solid starting point for future studies. In particular, for \emph{multi-step} revealing POMDPs, we show that (1) the latent state-space dependence is at least $ฮฉ(S^{1.5})$ in the PAC sample complexity, which is notably harder than the $\widetildeฮ˜(S)$ scaling for fully-observable MDPs; (2) Any polynomial sublinear regret is at least $ฮฉ(T^{2/3})$, suggesting its fundamental difference from the \emph{single-step} case where $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$ regret is achievable. Technically, our hard instance construction adapts techniques in \emph{distribution testing}, which is new to the RL literature and may be of independent interest.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Machine Learning

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted