Quadratic Memory is Necessary for Optimal Query Complexity in Convex Optimization: Center-of-Mass is Pareto-Optimal

February 09, 2023 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› Annual Conference Computational Learning Theory

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Moรฏse Blanchard, Junhui Zhang, Patrick Jaillet arXiv ID 2302.04963 Category cs.LG: Machine Learning Cross-listed cs.CC, cs.DS, math.OC, stat.ML Citations 6 Venue Annual Conference Computational Learning Theory Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
We give query complexity lower bounds for convex optimization and the related feasibility problem. We show that quadratic memory is necessary to achieve the optimal oracle complexity for first-order convex optimization. In particular, this shows that center-of-mass cutting-planes algorithms in dimension $d$ which use $\tilde O(d^2)$ memory and $\tilde O(d)$ queries are Pareto-optimal for both convex optimization and the feasibility problem, up to logarithmic factors. Precisely, we prove that to minimize $1$-Lipschitz convex functions over the unit ball to $1/d^4$ accuracy, any deterministic first-order algorithms using at most $d^{2-ฮด}$ bits of memory must make $\tildeฮฉ(d^{1+ฮด/3})$ queries, for any $ฮด\in[0,1]$. For the feasibility problem, in which an algorithm only has access to a separation oracle, we show a stronger trade-off: for at most $d^{2-ฮด}$ memory, the number of queries required is $\tildeฮฉ(d^{1+ฮด})$. This resolves a COLT 2019 open problem of Woodworth and Srebro.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Machine Learning

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted