Maximum Coverage in Sublinear Space, Faster
February 13, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· π The Sea
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Stephen Jaud, Anthony Wirth, Farhana Choudhury
arXiv ID
2302.06137
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Citations
2
Venue
The Sea
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Given a collection of $m$ sets from a universe $\mathcal{U}$, the Maximum Set Coverage problem consists of finding $k$ sets whose union has largest cardinality. This problem is NP-Hard, but the solution can be approximated by a polynomial time algorithm up to a factor $1-1/e$. However, this algorithm does not scale well with the input size. In a streaming context, practical high-quality solutions are found, but with space complexity that scales linearly with respect to the size of the universe $|\mathcal{U}|$. However, one randomized streaming algorithm has been shown to produce a $1-1/e-\varepsilon$ approximation of the optimal solution with a space complexity that scales only poly-logarithmically with respect to $m$ and $|\mathcal{U}|$. In order to achieve such a low space complexity, the authors used a technique called subsampling, based on independent-wise hash functions, and $F_0$-sketching. This article focuses on this sublinear-space algorithm and introduces methods to reduce the time cost of subsampling. Firstly, we give some optimizations that do not alter the space complexity, number of passes and approximation quality of the original algorithm. In particular, we reanalyze the error bounds to show that the original independence factor of $Ξ©(\varepsilon^{-2} k \log m)$ can be fine-tuned to $Ξ©(k \log m)$. Secondly we show that $F_0$-sketching can be replaced by a much more simple mechanism. Finally, our experimental results show that even a pairwise-independent hash-function sampler does not produce worse solution than the original algorithm, while running significantly faster by several orders of magnitude.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted