Maximum Coverage in Sublinear Space, Faster

February 13, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› The Sea

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Stephen Jaud, Anthony Wirth, Farhana Choudhury arXiv ID 2302.06137 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 2 Venue The Sea Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Given a collection of $m$ sets from a universe $\mathcal{U}$, the Maximum Set Coverage problem consists of finding $k$ sets whose union has largest cardinality. This problem is NP-Hard, but the solution can be approximated by a polynomial time algorithm up to a factor $1-1/e$. However, this algorithm does not scale well with the input size. In a streaming context, practical high-quality solutions are found, but with space complexity that scales linearly with respect to the size of the universe $|\mathcal{U}|$. However, one randomized streaming algorithm has been shown to produce a $1-1/e-\varepsilon$ approximation of the optimal solution with a space complexity that scales only poly-logarithmically with respect to $m$ and $|\mathcal{U}|$. In order to achieve such a low space complexity, the authors used a technique called subsampling, based on independent-wise hash functions, and $F_0$-sketching. This article focuses on this sublinear-space algorithm and introduces methods to reduce the time cost of subsampling. Firstly, we give some optimizations that do not alter the space complexity, number of passes and approximation quality of the original algorithm. In particular, we reanalyze the error bounds to show that the original independence factor of $Ξ©(\varepsilon^{-2} k \log m)$ can be fine-tuned to $Ξ©(k \log m)$. Secondly we show that $F_0$-sketching can be replaced by a much more simple mechanism. Finally, our experimental results show that even a pairwise-independent hash-function sampler does not produce worse solution than the original algorithm, while running significantly faster by several orders of magnitude.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted