Understanding Stationary and Moving Direct Skin Vibrotactile Stimulation on the Palm

Palm-based tactile displays have the potential to evolve from single motor interfaces (e.g., smartphones) to high-resolution tactile displays (e.g., back-of-device haptic interfaces) enabling richer multi-modal experiences with more information. However, we lack a systematic understanding of vibrotactile perception on the palm and the influence of various factors on the core design decisions of tactile displays (number of actuators, resolution, and intensity). In a first experiment (N=16), we investigated the effect of these factors on the users' ability to localize stationary sensations. In a second experiment (N=20), we explored the influence of resolution on recognition rate for moving tactile sensations.Findings show that for stationary sensations a 9 actuator display offers a good trade-off and a $3\times3$ resolution can be accurately localized. For moving sensations, a $2\times4$ resolution led to the highest recognition accuracy, while $5\times10$ enables higher resolution output with a reasonable accuracy.