Decoding the Divide: Analyzing Disparities in Broadband Plans Offered by Major US ISPs

February 28, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Udit Paul, Vinothini Gunasekaran, Jiamo Liu, Tejas N. Narechania, Arpit Gupta, Elizabeth Belding arXiv ID 2302.14216 Category cs.NI: Networking & Internet Citations 14 Venue Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Digital equity in Internet access is often measured along three axes: availability, affordability, and adoption. Most prior work focuses on availability; the other two aspects have received little attention. In this paper, we study broadband affordability in the US. Specifically, we focus on the nature of broadband plans offered by major ISPs across the US. To this end, we develop a broadband plan querying tool (BQT) that obtains broadband plans (upload/download speed and price) offered by seven major ISPs for any street address in the US. We then use this tool to curate a dataset, querying broadband plans for over 837k street addresses in thirty cities for seven major wireline broadband ISPs. We use a plan's carriage value, the Mbps of a user's traffic that an ISP carries for one dollar, to compare plans. Our analysis provides us with the following new insights: (1) ISP plans vary inter-city. Specifically, the fraction of census block groups that receive high and low carriage value plans varies widely by city; (2) ISP plans intra-city are spatially clustered, and the carriage value can vary as much as 600% within a city; (3) Cable-based ISPs offer up to 30% more carriage value to users when competing with fiber-based ISPs in a block group; and (4) Average income in a block group plays a critical role in dictating who gets a fiber deployment (i.e., a better carriage value) in the US. While we hope our tool, dataset, and analysis in their current form are helpful for policymakers at different levels (city, county, state), they are only a small step toward understanding digital equity. Based on our learnings, we conclude with recommendations to continue to advance our understanding of broadband affordability.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Networking & Internet

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted