Tight bounds for the sensitivity of CDAWGs with left-end edits

March 03, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Acta Informatica

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Hiroto Fujimaru, Yuto Nakashima, Shunsuke Inenaga arXiv ID 2303.01726 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 2 Venue Acta Informatica Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Compact directed acyclic word graphs (CDAWGs) [Blumer et al. 1987] are a fundamental data structure on strings with applications in text pattern searching, data compression, and pattern discovery. Intuitively, the CDAWG of a string $T$ is obtained by merging isomorphic subtrees of the suffix tree [Weiner 1973] of the same string $T$, thus CDAWGs are a compact indexing structure. In this paper, we investigate the sensitivity of CDAWGs when a single character edit operation (insertion, deletion, or substitution) is performed at the left-end of the input string $T$, namely, we are interested in the worst-case increase in the size of the CDAWG after a left-end edit operation. We prove that if $e$ is the number of edges of the CDAWG for string $T$, then the number of new edges added to the CDAWG after a left-end edit operation on $T$ does not exceed $e$. Further, we present a matching lower bound on the sensitivity of CDAWGs for left-end insertions, and almost matching lower bounds for left-end deletions and substitutions. We then generalize our lower-bound instance for left-end insertions to leftward online construction of the CDAWG, and show that it requires $Ξ©(n^2)$ time for some string of length $n$.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted