Improving Adaptive Real-Time Video Communication Via Cross-layer Optimization
April 07, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· π IEEE transactions on multimedia
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Yueheng Li, Hao Chen, Bowei Xu, Zicheng Zhang, Zhan Ma
arXiv ID
2304.03505
Category
cs.MM: Multimedia
Cross-listed
cs.NI
Citations
8
Venue
IEEE transactions on multimedia
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
Effective Adaptive BitRate (ABR) algorithm or policy is of paramount importance for Real-Time Video Communication (RTVC) amid this pandemic to pursue uncompromised quality of experience (QoE). Existing ABR methods mainly separate the network bandwidth estimation and video encoder control, and fine-tune video bitrate towards estimated bandwidth, assuming the maximization of bandwidth utilization yields the optimal QoE. However, the QoE of a RTVC system is jointly determined by the quality of compressed video, fluency of video playback, and interaction delay. Solely maximizing the bandwidth utilization without comprehensively considering compound impacts incurred by both network and video application layers, does not assure the satisfactory QoE. And the decoupling of network and video layer further exacerbates the user experience due to network-codec incoordination. This work therefore proposes the Palette, a reinforcement learning based ABR scheme that unifies the processing of network and video application layers to directly maximize the QoE formulated as the weighted function of video quality, stalling rate and delay. To this aim, a cross-layer optimization is proposed to derive fine-grained compression factor of upcoming frame(s) using cross-layer observations like network conditions, video encoding parameters, and video content complexity. As a result, Palette manages to resolve the network-codec incoordination and to best catch up with the network fluctuation. Compared with state-of-the-art schemes in real-world tests, Palette not only reduces 3.1%-46.3% of the stalling rate, 20.2%-50.8% of the delay, but also improves 0.2%-7.2% of the video quality with comparable bandwidth consumption, under a variety of application scenarios.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Multimedia
π
π
Old Age
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Viewport-Adaptive Navigable 360-Degree Video Delivery
π
π
The Cartographer
A Comprehensive Survey on Cross-modal Retrieval
π
π
The Cartographer
An Overview of Cross-media Retrieval: Concepts, Methodologies, Benchmarks and Challenges
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
A Convolutional Neural Network Approach for Post-Processing in HEVC Intra Coding
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Video Generation From Text
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted