Interior Point Methods with a Gradient Oracle
April 10, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Symposium on the Theory of Computing
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Adrian Vladu
arXiv ID
2304.04550
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Cross-listed
math.OC
Citations
2
Venue
Symposium on the Theory of Computing
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
We provide an interior point method based on quasi-Newton iterations, which only requires first-order access to a strongly self-concordant barrier function. To achieve this, we extend the techniques of Dunagan-Harvey [STOC '07] to maintain a preconditioner, while using only first-order information. We measure the quality of this preconditioner in terms of its relative excentricity to the unknown Hessian matrix, and we generalize these techniques to convex functions with a slowly-changing Hessian. We combine this with an interior point method to show that, given first-order access to an appropriate barrier function for a convex set $K$, we can solve well-conditioned linear optimization problems over $K$ to $\varepsilon$ precision in time $\widetilde{O}\left(\left(\mathcal{T}+n^{2}\right)\sqrt{nΞ½}\log\left(1/\varepsilon\right)\right)$, where $Ξ½$ is the self-concordance parameter of the barrier function, and $\mathcal{T}$ is the time required to make a gradient query. As a consequence we show that: $\bullet$ Linear optimization over $n$-dimensional convex sets can be solved in time $\widetilde{O}\left(\left(\mathcal{T}n+n^{3}\right)\log\left(1/\varepsilon\right)\right)$. This parallels the running time achieved by state of the art algorithms for cutting plane methods, when replacing separation oracles with first-order oracles for an appropriate barrier function. $\bullet$ We can solve semidefinite programs involving $m\geq n$ matrices in $\mathbb{R}^{n\times n}$ in time $\widetilde{O}\left(mn^{4}+m^{1.25}n^{3.5}\log\left(1/\varepsilon\right)\right)$, improving over the state of the art algorithms, in the case where $m=Ξ©\left(n^{\frac{3.5}{Ο-1.25}}\right)$. Along the way we develop a host of tools allowing us to control the evolution of our potential functions, using techniques from matrix analysis and Schur convexity.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted