Evaluation of short range depth sonifications for visual-to-auditory sensory substitution
April 11, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· π IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Louis Commère, Jean Rouat
arXiv ID
2304.05462
Category
cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction
Citations
9
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Visual to auditory sensory substitution devices convert visual information into sound and can provide valuable assistance for blind people. Recent iterations of these devices rely on depth sensors. Rules for converting depth into sound (i.e. the sonifications) are often designed arbitrarily, with no strong evidence for choosing one over another. The purpose of this work is to compare and understand the effectiveness of five depth sonifications in order to assist the design process of future visual to auditory systems for blind people which rely on depth sensors. The frequency, amplitude and reverberation of the sound as well as the repetition rate of short high-pitched sounds and the signal-to-noise ratio of a mixture between pure sound and noise are studied. We conducted positioning experiments with twenty-eight sighted blindfolded participants. Stage 1 incorporates learning phases followed by depth estimation tasks. Stage 2 adds the additional challenge of azimuth estimation to the first stage's protocol. Stage 3 tests learning retention by incorporating a 10-minute break before re-testing depth estimation. The best depth estimates in stage 1 were obtained with the sound frequency and the repetition rate of beeps. In stage 2, the beep repetition rate yielded the best depth estimation and no significant difference was observed for the azimuth estimation. Results of stage 3 showed that the beep repetition rate was the easiest sonification to memorize. Based on statistical analysis of the results, we discuss the effectiveness of each sonification and compare with other studies that encode depth into sounds. Finally we provide recommendations for the design of depth encoding.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Human-Computer Interaction
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Identifying Stable Patterns over Time for Emotion Recognition from EEG
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiences
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunities
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted