Deterministic stream-sampling for probabilistic programming: semantics and verification

April 26, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Logic in Computer Science

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Fredrik Dahlqvist, Alexandra Silva, William Smith arXiv ID 2304.13504 Category cs.PL: Programming Languages Cross-listed cs.LO Citations 3 Venue Logic in Computer Science Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Probabilistic programming languages rely fundamentally on some notion of sampling, and this is doubly true for probabilistic programming languages which perform Bayesian inference using Monte Carlo techniques. Verifying samplers - proving that they generate samples from the correct distribution - is crucial to the use of probabilistic programming languages for statistical modelling and inference. However, the typical denotational semantics of probabilistic programs is incompatible with deterministic notions of sampling. This is problematic, considering that most statistical inference is performed using pseudorandom number generators. We present a higher-order probabilistic programming language centred on the notion of samplers and sampler operations. We give this language an operational and denotational semantics in terms of continuous maps between topological spaces. Our language also supports discontinuous operations, such as comparisons between reals, by using the type system to track discontinuities. This feature might be of independent interest, for example in the context of differentiable programming. Using this language, we develop tools for the formal verification of sampler correctness. We present an equational calculus to reason about equivalence of samplers, and a sound calculus to prove semantic correctness of samplers, i.e. that a sampler correctly targets a given measure by construction.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Programming Languages

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted