Threat Perception Modulation by Capturing Emotion, Motor and Empathetic System Responses: A Systematic Review
April 28, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Elizabeth M. Jacobs, Fani Deligianni., Frank Pollick
arXiv ID
2305.00038
Category
cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction
Citations
0
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
The fight or flight phenomena is of evolutionary origin and responsible for the type of defensive behaviours enacted, when in the face of threat. This review attempts to draw the link between fear and aggression as behavioural motivations for fight or flight defensive behaviours. Hence, this review intends to examine whether fight or flight behavioural responses are the result of fear and aggression. Furthermore, this review investigates whether human biological motion captures the affective states associated with the fight or flight phenomenon. This review also aims to investigate how threat informed emotion and motor systems have the potential to result in empathetic appraisal modulation. This is of interest to this systematic review, as empathetic modulation is crucial to prosocial drive, which has the potential to increase the inclination of alleviating the perceived threat of another. Hence, this review investigates the role of affective computing in capturing the potential outcome of empathy from threat perception. To gain a comprehensive understanding of the affective states and biological motion evoked from threat scenarios, affective computing methods used to capture these behavioural responses are discussed. A systematic review using Google Scholar and Web of Science was conducted as of 2023, and findings were supplemented by bibliographies of key articles. A total of 22 studies were analysed from initial web searches to explore the topics of empathy, threat perception, fight or flight, fear, aggression, and human motion. Relationships between affective states (fear, aggression) and corresponding motor defensive behaviours (fight or flight) were examined within threat scenarios, and whether existing affective computing methods are succinct in capturing these responses, identifying the varying consensus in the literature, challenges, and limitations of existing research.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Human-Computer Interaction
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Identifying Stable Patterns over Time for Emotion Recognition from EEG
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiences
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunities
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted