Explicit Knowledge Graph Reasoning for Conversational Recommendation

May 01, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Xuhui Ren, Tong Chen, Quoc Viet Hung Nguyen, Lizhen Cui, Zi Huang, Hongzhi Yin arXiv ID 2305.00783 Category cs.IR: Information Retrieval Citations 31 Venue ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Traditional recommender systems estimate user preference on items purely based on historical interaction records, thus failing to capture fine-grained yet dynamic user interests and letting users receive recommendation only passively. Recent conversational recommender systems (CRSs) tackle those limitations by enabling recommender systems to interact with the user to obtain her/his current preference through a sequence of clarifying questions. Despite the progress achieved in CRSs, existing solutions are far from satisfaction in the following two aspects: 1) current CRSs usually require each user to answer a quantity of clarifying questions before reaching the final recommendation, which harms the user experience; 2) there is a semantic gap between the learned representations of explicitly mentioned attributes and items. To address these drawbacks, we introduce the knowledge graph (KG) as the auxiliary information for comprehending and reasoning a user's preference, and propose a new CRS framework, namely Knowledge Enhanced Conversational Reasoning (KECR) system. As a user can reflect her/his preference via both attribute- and item-level expressions, KECR closes the semantic gap between two levels by embedding the structured knowledge in the KG. Meanwhile, KECR utilizes the connectivity within the KG to conduct explicit reasoning of the user demand, making the model less dependent on the user's feedback to clarifying questions. KECR can find a prominent reasoning chain to make the recommendation explainable and more rationale, as well as smoothen the conversation process, leading to better user experience and conversational recommendation accuracy. Extensive experiments on two real-world datasets demonstrate our approach's superiority over state-of-the-art baselines in both automatic evaluations and human judgments.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Information Retrieval

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted