Towards Understanding Machine Learning Testing in Practise

May 08, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› 2023 IEEE/ACM 2nd International Conference on AI Engineering – Software Engineering for AI (CAIN)

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Arumoy Shome, Luis Cruz, Arie van Deursen arXiv ID 2305.04988 Category cs.SE: Software Engineering Citations 2 Venue 2023 IEEE/ACM 2nd International Conference on AI Engineering – Software Engineering for AI (CAIN) Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Visualisations drive all aspects of the Machine Learning (ML) Development Cycle but remain a vastly untapped resource by the research community. ML testing is a highly interactive and cognitive process which demands a human-in-the-loop approach. Besides writing tests for the code base, bulk of the evaluation requires application of domain expertise to generate and interpret visualisations. To gain a deeper insight into the process of testing ML systems, we propose to study visualisations of ML pipelines by mining Jupyter notebooks. We propose a two prong approach in conducting the analysis. First, gather general insights and trends using a qualitative study of a smaller sample of notebooks. And then use the knowledge gained from the qualitative study to design an empirical study using a larger sample of notebooks. Computational notebooks provide a rich source of information in three formats -- text, code and images. We hope to utilise existing work in image analysis and Natural Language Processing for text and code, to analyse the information present in notebooks. We hope to gain a new perspective into program comprehension and debugging in the context of ML testing.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Software Engineering

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted