Entanglement-based Mutual Quantum Distance Bounding
May 17, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· π International Conference on Cyber Security Cryptography and Machine Learning
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Aysajan Abidin, Karim Eldefrawy, Dave Singelee
arXiv ID
2305.09905
Category
cs.CR: Cryptography & Security
Citations
5
Venue
International Conference on Cyber Security Cryptography and Machine Learning
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Mutual distance bounding (DB) protocols enable two distrusting parties to establish an upper-bound on the distance between them. DB has been so far mainly considered in classical settings and for classical applications, especially in wireless settings, e.g., to prevent relay attacks in wireless authentication and access control systems, and for secure localization. While recent research has started exploring DB in quantum settings, all current quantum DB (QDB) protocols employ quantum-bits (qubits) in the rapid-bit exchange phase and only perform one-way DB. Specifically, the latest QDB proposals improve the initial ones by adding resistance to photon number splitting attacks, and improving round complexity by avoiding communication from the prover to the verifier in the last authentication phase. This paper presents two new QDB protocols that differ from previously proposed protocols in several aspects: (1) to the best of our knowledge, our protocols are the first to utilize entangled qubits in the rapid-bit exchange phase, previous protocols relied on sending individual qubits, not those from a pair of entangled ones; (2) our second protocol can perform mutual QDB between two parties in one execution, previous QDB protocols had to be executed twice with the prover and verifier roles reversed in each execution; (3) the use of entangled qubits in our protocols thwarts attacks that previous QDB protocols were prone to; (4) and finally, our protocols also eliminate the need for communication from the prover to the verifier in the last authentication phase, which was necessary in some previous QDB protocols. Our work paves the way for several interesting research directions which we briefly discuss in detail in the appendix.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Cryptography & Security
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Spectre Attacks: Exploiting Speculative Execution
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
How To Backdoor Federated Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Time
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted