(Noisy) Gap Cycle Counting Strikes Back: Random Order Streaming Lower Bounds for Connected Components and Beyond
May 18, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Symposium on the Theory of Computing
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Sepehr Assadi, Janani Sundaresan
arXiv ID
2305.11053
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Cross-listed
cs.CC
Citations
5
Venue
Symposium on the Theory of Computing
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
We continue the study of the communication complexity of gap cycle counting problems. These problems have been introduced by Verbin and Yu [SODA 2011] and have found numerous applications in proving streaming lower bounds. In the noisy gap cycle counting problem (NGC), there is a small integer $k \geq 1$ and an $n$-vertex graph consisted of vertex-disjoint union of either $k$-cycles or $2k$-cycles, plus $O(n/k)$ disjoint paths of length $k-1$ in both cases (``noise''). The edges of this graph are partitioned between Alice and Bob whose goal is to decide which case the graph belongs to with minimal communication from Alice to Bob. We study the robust communication complexity -- `a la Chakrabarti, Cormode, and McGregor [STOC 2008] -- of NGC, namely, when edges are partitioned randomly between the players. This is in contrast to all prior work on gap cycle counting problems in adversarial partitions. While NGC can be solved trivially with zero communication when $k < \log{n}$, we prove that when $k$ is a constant factor larger than $\log{n}$, the robust (one-way) communication complexity of NGC is $Ξ©(n)$ bits. As a corollary of this result, we can prove several new graph streaming lower bounds for random order streams. In particular, we show that any streaming algorithm that for every $\varepsilon > 0$ estimates the number of connected components of a graph presented in a random order stream to within an $\varepsilon \cdot n$ additive factor requires $2^{Ξ©(1/\varepsilon)}$ space, settling a conjecture of Peng and Sohler [SODA 2018]. We further discuss new implications of our lower bounds to other problems such as estimating size of maximum matchings and independent sets on planar graphs, random walks, as well as to stochastic streams.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted